SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Sauna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Poet who wrote (91)7/5/2001 11:35:10 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 1857
 
I'm
unsure as to whether her therapist is legally bound to tell the other parent, but I'd be
surprised if it were legally out of bounds for him or her to do so.


Actually, from the way I understand their ethical requirements, unless it IS legally required to tell, it IS out of bounds. The patient-counselor relationship is based on absolute confidence, even (often especially) from the spouse. The counsellor CAN NOT say ANYTHING (even to admit the existence of the counseling relationship) unless either the patient knowingly consents (and one problem is that some patients can't knowingly consent because they don't have the stability to) or it is required (not permitted, but required) by law. Only those two conditions allow the counselor to break the confidentiality of the relationship.

It's an even stricter standard than lawyers have. A lawyer can generally acknowledge a client-attorney relationship, for example, if a suit or charges are filed certain of the information becomes public automatically, and the lawyer is allowed to disclose when he feels it is in the best interests of the client without getting a specific written client release. The therapist can't do any of those things.

So it wouldn't surprise me if her therapist hadn't told her husband how bad things were if they hadn't gotten to the stage of mandatory disclosure, unless she had authorized the disclosures in writing.