Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (8606)	7/5/2001 11:39:49 PM
From: techreports	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

When the facts don't correlate with the theory, there are two choices: 1. ignore the facts 2. abandon the theory The gorilla game theory is not a short term process so using 12 months isn't fair. It might be like saying that the last 12 months proves holding stocks is a bad strategy. Which it might be ;)

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (8606)	7/6/2001 1:01:04 AM
From: kas1	Respond to of 10934

JS, Excellent post. What a learning experience this has been.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (8606)	7/6/2001 2:17:49 AM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

>> The Gorilla Game tells you that Gorillas have future earnings that will grow faster than "lesser grades". Also, those earnings are more reliable (more predictable for further into the future, less influenced by macro events) than the earnings of "lesser grades", and therefore Gorillas will always command higher multiples. Please site references for the above, Jacob. I think a re-reading of tfm may be in order. uf