Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (72958)	7/6/2001 3:59:11 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116761

Ken's point exactly calls the CEO's of ABX & HM liars. Ken has said they will only increase their hedge position while BOTH CEO's said the opposite. If Ken has been so "right on" then I guess the recent run from $252 to the current range NEVER HAPPENED. If Ken were "right on" there would have been no up move in PoG today or ever again. Next, If Ken can make all those comments about my insanity from the crows nest, the door has ben opened. I have every right to reply in kind. Then lastly if paperhanging is the way out,why is it right for Ken to bad mouth the paperhangers? Anyone who calls names must accept name calling. Any who praise hedging must not rail against it in the following post. Some of his exact quotes Ken Benes Friday, Jun 8, 2001 4:05 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 72960 Pathetic, if all you can show for a gazillion posts from your crows nest, is a 20.00 dollar rally off its lows. Ken Benes Friday, Jun 8, 2001 4:19 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 72960 You are slipping, thirteen minutes and no post. I guess, you are out of the crows nest guzzling champagne to celebrate an up day in the gold market. You had better get back to your post, meteors travel at 25000 mph and you might just miss one streaking into the planet. Ken Benes Monday, May 21, 2001 11:45 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 72960 Tick, tock, another rally about to implode. Thank god for bourbon. I hope your liver can out live the poor performance of gold. Get some sleep.

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (72958)	7/6/2001 4:04:36 PM
From: Horgad	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116761

I really didn't want to get in the middle of the battle between Ken and long-gone, but I have to say I don't see how you can fault one but not the other. In any case, the thread would benefit if both of them called a truce and refrained from making personal attacks. Just my humble opinion...

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (72958)	7/6/2001 5:14:53 PM
From: marek_wojna	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116761

I have to totally disagree with your call. Richard is posting any possible messages which can affect the POG, giving reasons etc. From Ken side except "gold will never go up" due to the cooperation of bankers - producers I don't hear too much. O, same or bigger attacks on Richard. Motion rejected.

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (72958)	7/6/2001 5:21:18 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116761

Look here what he said: "Ken Benes Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:43 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 72964 CB's selling and leasing are the pivotal point of the gold market and maintains an air of impunity which the bankers flourish. It is easy for GS and the others to buy when the pog hits support and then sell into the rallies. The paper sales, rumors of cb selling, and producer hedging are the factors keeping gold rangebound. This scenario will continue as long as they operate in a risk free environment. Ken " He offers up into this informed forum only his half baked often false opinion. Everyone here must have noticed the recent hedge book failures! If there have been hedge book failures can producer hedging really correctly be called risk free? Yes, we all have an opinion & an agenda, but all others here offer up more than their own opinion in support of that agenda. Most also post other places in S.I. don't they?