Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tinkershaw who wrote (75408)	7/7/2001 8:51:33 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi tinkershaw; Re: "Bilow, thanks for the reply. Took awhile to build up the ammunition I see. But I'll take 1 Intel over 10 Vias any day. It is a bit like saying the whole world is going Linux, look at X, Y, Z and D. All those engineers chose Linux, but not Microsoft. I'll stick with 1 Microsoft and 1 Intel anyday." Maybe you didn't notice, but Intel decided to support DDR, both with their own chipsets and with chipsets designed for the P4 by companies they licensed. Re: "I look forward to more Rambus "defalsification" and just how they hoodwinked Intel's best engineers." Rambus didn't hoodwink Intel's best engineers. They hoodwinked Intel's management: e-insite.net Now, since Intel decided to support DDR, do you have a similar article explaining how it was that TeamDDR hoodwinked Intel? I'd also like to know how the following companies got hoodwinked into designing chips that use DDR: AMD Intel VIA SiS ServerWorks IBM ALi Nanya ATi STMicroelectronics PMCS Clearwater Networks Transmeta Microsoft Nintendo (DDR-II) Sun (rumor) Trident National Semi I really do want to hear why so many in industry were fooled into using DDR, and why so few were fooled into using RDRAM. -- Carl P.S. "Defalsificiation" isn't a word I used, as far as I can recall...