Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (11209)	7/7/2001 2:48:48 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

Ok, I am sorry if I turned your words. What do you think of the stats?? Don't you feel as if many folks who claim they want research for better and longer lives, are just huffin air? And I STILL say that just because there ARE abortions, is a VERY slippery slope to use as a reason to approve of the research. There is already a baby parts market JUST BECAUSE there are abortions.......

To: Rainy_Day_Woman who wrote (11209)	7/7/2001 3:26:08 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 59480

<<I said I supported it [the research] because there are abortions and miscarriages and still births and to use the tissues and stem cells as opposed to discarding it>> That does seem awfully wasteful. I think people are afraid the cell harvesting would be used to validate and maybe cause more abortions. I'd be careful with the miscarriages and still births about possible chromosome damage the might have caused them to happen.