SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Calladine who wrote (19967)7/7/2001 6:40:35 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30051
 
Jim, during real bear markets you get a double whamo, earning reductions due to economic conditions and P/E compression. Frankly, in "old" traditional bear markets, stock's floor have been around 80% of book and sometimes lower, so when I say 2/3 times book, I am already taking into account that both companies are typically stellar competitors. NTAP has grown more rapidly in recent years than EMC, but that was for two reasons, EMC was much bigger, and NTAP operated in a "virgin market" (smaller storage systems rather then the giant systems EMC and IBM were competing against each other for). Since the acquisition of Data General by EMC, they are now targeting NTAP turf, and EMC is not a slouch, with more than $3 B in their coffers, they can afford to compete aggressively and they will, that will slow down the torrid growth if NTAP, IMTO, and thus bring their respective PE more in line with each other. Actually, the situation should be compared to INTC and AMD, and INTC was often "awarded" a greater PE than AMD in recognition of its leadership position, the same with differential PE's between AMAT and NVLS and KLAC on the other side. Aggressive well managed leaders with full coffers should be awarded greater PE than their smaller siblings, IMTO.

Thanks for the kind words, what happened, we had a stalking visitor? (g).

Zeev