Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (6502)	7/8/2001 2:02:40 PM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

what are you boys looking for next week?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (6502)	7/8/2001 2:04:06 PM
From: JRI	Respond to of 209892

Here's a guy after your heart....old points...but a good "chant" to do during trading day....THE BIGGER PICTURE (warning: a bit wordy) Message 16044346

To: AllansAlias who wrote (6502)	7/8/2001 2:08:53 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Rydex update for Friday...interesting (reading, and reading between lines of J.T.'s comments)....it would support a 5th wave down on Monday, and a sharp 2.....Looks like J.T.'s looking for more up (after that)...but don't wanna read too much into his comments..... Message 16041600

To: AllansAlias who wrote (6502)	7/8/2001 2:26:30 PM
From: UnBelievable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

One Problem With The Ameritrader Data Is It only includes those trades that are currently being made. The ever changing sample set makes interpreting the statistic problematic. The ratio does not take into account those people who previously would have bought the dip in the past but did not this time. If historical data about the number of traders or trades that were included when the indicator was first published could be determined, as well as the number each day, and then the index as the percent of traders who bought out of those who could have bought (including the non trades as non buys), the statistic would have usefulness. As is I think that the only thing we can conclude with certainty from the current index, is that as long as there are buyers the bottom is not in.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (6502)	7/8/2001 3:06:34 PM
From: John Madarasz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

always a pleasure to contribute here, thanks for the chart. I think I can say distribution...can you say distribution too?<gg> I count 5 days again so far in the last 4 weeks on compx, starting with the June 14th session of down days on higher volume than the previous session...a serious warning signal dictating a defensive posture. stockcharts.com[w,a]daclnymy[db][pc5!c21!f][vc60][iUb14!La8,17,9!Lf!Lh5,5!Li5,5!Lg!Lc20] successively lower volumes on each rally as well with exception to the latest lower high <g> OTC and NYSE bullish %'s remain on sell signals both short and longer term Wildly bullish counts and exhortations to buy into them only re-affirm what I believe is still to high a level of intermediate to longer term complacency.