Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AremisSoft Corporation (AREM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (522)	7/13/2001 12:32:40 AM
From: Richard James	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 683

Kevin, Were dropped on your head at birthing or what? A. "The other purpose is to give the Company additional flexibility in future financings. Can't you read the frickin proxy statement for yourself? I guess I was expecting something with some manner of substance. Anyway AREM seems to have managed to make an acquisition just fine without this extra class of common stock. Well than Kevin, maybe AREM has something new planned in regards to future acquisitions. B. Numerous complaints have been filed with the SEC, but it has taken no action. Should that not tell you something about the SEC's opinion of the merits of said complaints, or does that simply make the SEC part of the great Greenberg/Rocker/New York Times conspiracy against AREM? Duh. The fact that the SEC has yet to take action on complaints that are only a few weeks old doesn't indicate anything as to what it may do. C. Regarding the "failed to deliver" problem, you should see letter no. 19 to AremisSoft Shareholders at www.irwinljacobs.com You'll pardon me if I take anything on the Irwin Jacobs site with the same truckload of salt you apparently take Herb Greenberg's columns with. I never pardon stupid people. There is a vast difference in taking assertions with a grain of salt and ignoring what they have to say. But the most important thing is a letter from A.G. Edwards to its client concerning the failure to deliver and a call to the NSCC. But don't look at it Kevin.