SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (47017)7/10/2001 8:18:27 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTHRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 275872
 
No, I think you are just a sore loser. The sales history that you have so much confidence in, from three sales clerks at one store, that are underpaid and wondering who the hell this guy is that keeps asking them questions, is probably not the same data base that CC uses to make it's decision. Probably their decision was based on chain wide sales trends. And AMD lost.

So.... just after a quarter in which by all accounts AMD gained more market share from Intel than in any quarter in their history, you claim that the Circuit City wide data base says the correct thing from their perspective to do is to reduce AMD's display exposure from 10 systems to 2. You can't be serious. And who said anything about winning or losing? If there is a loser here, it is the average non informed consumer who is being denied a choice of competing systems. I'm just pointing out what I believe to be the reality. And so far..... I think my version of the reality makes a lot more sense than yours.

THE WATSONYOUTH



To: Road Walker who wrote (47017)7/11/2001 12:26:24 AM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"But you better be right if you make that accusation, because if you are wrong it's slander."

What? Is it a kind of thread, you idiot?

- Ali