Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (139018)	7/10/2001 10:52:39 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, <the policy of Intel management is that the shareholders cannot be trusted with information on how the company is run, where the revenues are coming from, breakdown of server revenue vs. other segments, and sequential changes in these segments.> It's one thing to be vague. It's another thing to be totally off. And it's yet another thing to swindle. Tenchusatsu

To: Joe NYC who wrote (139018)	7/10/2001 11:02:11 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

course, with Intel, we are limited to these tidbits of information, because the policy of Intel management is that the shareholders cannot be trusted with information on how the company is run, where the revenues are coming from, breakdown of server revenue vs. other segments, and sequential changes in these segments. It is management's duty to disclose major financial issues. And Intel does this with more particularity that any other corporation which I follow. It is not their duty to show you how to run the business, or to ask your permission on what decisions to make that they and not you are responsible for. I am also fully aware that the foregoing contains a dangling preposition and for that I sincerely apologize. Duke

To: Joe NYC who wrote (139018)	7/10/2001 11:22:18 PM
From: SisterMaryElephant	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jozeph, <Of course, with Intel, we are limited to these tidbits of information, because the policy of Intel management is that the shareholders cannot be trusted with information on how the company is run, where the revenues are coming from, breakdown of server revenue vs. other segments, and sequential changes in these segments.> By comparison, AMD is very open and forthcoming, which is why everyone expected EPS for the quarter of 27 cents and we are now told they will be 3 cents. SK

To: Joe NYC who wrote (139018)	7/10/2001 11:39:44 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Of course, with Intel, we are limited to these tidbits of information, because the policy of Intel management is that the shareholders cannot be trusted with information on how the company is run, where the revenues are coming from, breakdown of server revenue vs. other segments, and sequential changes in these segments Just like mushrooms. Keep them in the dark and feed them sh*t. THE WATSONYOUTH

To: Joe NYC who wrote (139018)	7/12/2001 7:15:02 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 186894

Joe, <Of course, with Intel, we are limited to these tidbits of information, because the policy of Intel management is that the shareholders cannot be trusted with information on how the company is run, where the revenues are coming from, breakdown of server revenue vs. other segments, and sequential changes in these segments.> For the first time, Jerry declined to reveal the breakdown of CPU unit shipments between Athlon and Duron, citing "competitive reasons." Guess the AMD shareholders cannot be trusted with that piece of seemingly innocuous information, huh? LOL! Tenchusatsu