SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (5778)7/11/2001 11:44:21 AM
From: Stock Farmer  Respond to of 74559
 
Jay - you have my belief system over leveraged with all these derivatives!

And hence I am possibly due to experience a belief system collapse due to excessive counter-party risk!

Which is induced by too many parties.

John.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (5778)7/11/2001 3:04:54 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 74559
 
<In short, the impact of falling inflation prompted enormous capital gains for investors as nominal equity and bond yields declined. But now that the world has reached an era of low inflation, the gains from market rerating are likely to disappear.>

People think of low inflation as a thing which happens in nature, like coming across a valley or mountain or a climate change. It is not. It's a function of shortage [for example, demand for oil or supply cuts as in 1974 and 1979] or money printing. It's something people decide to cause whether they understand that or not. Climate change isn't a good example because a lot of people think people cause climate change by CO2 emissions. Hmm, that's a good example then = people think it's a natural phenomenon but it's really a people-caused event, like inflation. A similar level of confusion seems to surround climate change and inflation.

Paul Krugman thinks Japan should reach an era of high inflation, a climate change if you prefer, meaning they should create it by printing a bunch of Yen. I don't know about the orthogonal "Pigou effect" in the intertemporal maximization stuff, [I guess it's some CDMA variation] but since he's following my programme, he's obviously on the right track:
wws.princeton.edu

<...Japan's fundamental currency problem is not an excessively weak yen but a yen that, absent a commitment to inflation, tends to be too strong to effect the necessary export of capital; certainly the recent runup in the yen makes that position more comprehensible. The actual prospect of bank recapitalization also makes it much clearer than before that fixing the banks, while necessary on its own merits, is unlikely to do much to solve the economy's macroeconomic problems. And recent headlines about both the size of Japan's prospective budget deficit and the decision of Moody's to downgrade Japanese bonds suggest that the limits to fiscal policy, if they have not already been reached, will be reached soon. So the time seems ripe for a restatement of the argument that what Japan needs is moderate, "managed" inflation.

In addition to reemphasizing the case for Japanese inflation in the light of recent events, this note has a secondary purpose: to try, once again, to make it clear that this is not an outlandish or peculiar proposal. On the contrary, the proposition that the Japanese economy needs a negative real interest rate, which means that it needs expected inflation, is a direct implication of the same framework that most working macroeconomists routinely use for policy analysis. The utter conventionality of my reasoning may have been obscured in the earlier essays by the use of an "intertemporal maximization" framework, something I felt was necessary in order to avoid certain kinds of confusion. (If you really want to know, I had initially believed that the "Pigou effect" might play an important role in the discussion, and needed the intertemporal model to convince myself that it did not). In any case, this time I present the argument in terms of an absolutely conventional open-economy IS-LM model, exactly the same model that is presented, say, in the Krugman-Obstfeld international economics textbook or Olivier Blanchard's macroeconomics textbook....
>

We can expect a competitive inflation, or more accurately a synchronized inflation - it's nice to agree on things Jay! I've been waiting for a competitive inflation for a few years - more accurately, I've been betting on it and enjoying that which has been going on, sneakily, for a decade and more. The inflation has been hidden because of the productivity bonus which enables printing without inflation being evident. But it appears in ever-rising stockmarkets [not in Japan due to big glitches in debt and asset values from the 1980s still rumbling, plus demographics and stuff - not in NZ due to 1987 crash, the aftermath, still rumbling, and mostly being a farm].

Stephen 'once upon a time' King also wrote:
<Assuming ratings can hold at current levels (they are high by historical standards), returns from equities will now be more closely linked to profits growth. Profits growth in turn is likely to be linked to nominal GDP growth, which has been running at about 5-6 per cent in the developed world. That means investors can expect equity returns only in the single digits. >

What the heck is wrong with single digit returns? Heck, if those are available [instead of losses] people should be buying stocks now. Actually, profit growth will be linked to new technology developments [the productivity bonus] as much as population and GDP growth.

Anyway, I really am wondering what the Nikkei P:E is. I will give a big cheer to whoever can find it.

Mq

PS: Gee Jay, cyberspace REM at 3 am - cyberspace drives people nuts! I was on the case at 6am today...