Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 4:33:27 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Sierratimes.com BTW you will NOT like this website. You've either misjudged the Sierra Times or misjudged me. This is a fabulous site! I think I'll be spending my entire morning at Sierra times... Hot damn! If you care about Freedom...Subtitle: The History of New World Order by Henrietta Bowman - Published: 02.17.01; sierratimes.com My babe! Henrietta has led me to the facts about the New World Order.... And she has listed a group of people/organizations that have been complicit [historically] in the formation of this New World Order. To quote Henrietta...Thanks to the link to a single search engine, the evidence is plain - it can no longer be dismissed as theory, but it damned sure has been a conspiracy! Let's look at this list of the conspirators!..... William Rockefeller Jacob Schiff George H Bush [George H. Bush !!!! My, my.] Adolf Hitler [Goodness, George gets ranked abover Hitler] Paul Moritz Warburg Edward Windsor Pamella Harriman Churchill Harry Dexter White I G Farben Company Bilderburg Group Henry Ford Sr. Andrew Carnegie J P Morgan Company In the first paragraph, Henrietta says: It is essential that freedom-lovers realize the same Liberal puppetmasters are financing and pulling the strings to destroy liberty for all of us. ******** I would very much like to hear your opinion on Henrietta Bowman; as well as your opinion on the New World Order. Aside: You can forget the earlier question on the link for that article by Henrietta Bowman and the question of who is Henrietta Bowman? jttmab

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 4:37:25 AM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 93284

Here's an interesting exchange between Henrietta and the Bowmanbrigade... bowmansbrigade.com jttmab

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 4:40:22 AM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 93284

Another interesting article by Henrietta Bowman henrybowman.com Gun Control by Stealth: Henrietta Bowman in it she says..... America's ATF policy is now decided by an international organization [OAS] that favors world government. jttmab

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 4:52:26 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

More good stuff from Henrietta Bowman..... sierratimes.com To the Members of Congress Assembled... By the Kinder, Gentler Henrietta Bowman - Posted: 01.16.01 One extract... Republicans, don't split your sides laughing yet. Lott, Hastert, Hatch, Stevens and others of our gutless so-called leaders, we have had a belly full of your wimpy compromises. Do you think America voted Republican due to your stellar performances over the past eight years? We voted Republican because it was the only way we could deverminize the White House of lying, corrupt, treasonous weasels. Perhaps the Republican Party should adopt "Elephants never forget" as our motto. One thing we DID learn from this fiasco is the reason behind the Democrat Party's choice of mascot--it has a lot of vicious jackasses that won't hesitate to kick you where it hurts. **************** This is absolutely fabulous! I encourage every one of you to take some time to look over the Sierra Times. It is important that each one of us understands the movements that are actively trying to drive American Politics. [Absolutely, no sarcasm] jttmab

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 5:04:45 AM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 93284

Let's take a look brief where Henrietta shows up on the road... The First Annual Fourth Branch Convention will be held at De Queen, Arkansas, from June 8th through the 12th, 2001! fourthbranch.org IMO, it's worthwhile to note the speakers, organizations and topics to be covered at the convention. It's unfortunate that we didn't know about this earlier. Some of us might have wanted to attend. jttmab

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 5:22:42 AM
From: jttmab	Respond to of 93284

It's good to have handy: henrybowman.com Mission Statement of the Henry Bowman [of Sierra Times] Brigade The Henry Bowman Brigade consists of a small group of people nationwide that has collectively reached its outrage tolerance limit with regard to the state of affairs in our country, the corruption of our government, and the degradation of our citizenry. We have come together to say "no more; this far and no further" to those who would destroy our great nation and the values which gave it birth. We have come together to pledge ourselves and all that we have to reversing the many destructive trends evident today in our schools, public institutions, governmental divisions and the fabric of social intercourse in our society. We have come together to say that we will pay any price, including the highest price, to make our country again into what it used to be, because we would rather die on our feet than live on our knees, perish rather than live as slaves. Finally, we have come together to warn those who would hold cheap our values, our estates and our lives . They will be judged by their own standard, and measured with their own yardstick . We will repay eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, and life for life. God Bless the United States of America Long Live the Republic ******************************* Note: there is a link available on the site who wish to join. jttmab

To: JeffA who wrote (4630)	7/12/2001 5:56:03 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

We can argue dates and words like proposed vs enacted, but what concerns me is the fact that these words exist in relation to "enforcement" by the UN. Well, we might as well, because it's fundamental to the debate. When someone such as Henrietta Bowman, knowingly selects information, excluding more current information and misses the distinction of proposals vs. those that were enacted to generate an image of speculation that she claims to have validity. That gets to the heart of the matter. Looking ahead at some of your concerns, you do the same. So I could "chase" every one of those speculations down; taking more effort and time than you do; and what happens next? You have me chase the next distorted speculation. I've seen that game played too many times. I'd rather be on your end of that game and let you get exhausted rather than me. But it isn't a game I wish to play from either side. It's just a variation of the "show me another source, because I don't particularly like AP wires". So I find another source [inadvertently validating that AP wires are not sufficient]; then what? I get asked for another source? I don't play that game either, sir. Notice a tactic that is inherent to either of the games. As you did in your post....We can argue dates and words like proposed vs enacted, but what concerns me is the fact.... Never acknowledging that I might have been correct that the article was selective research; suggesting that you "could" debate it...but let's move to another subject instead. I don't play that game. The other game, as played by jlallen, is what I call, the "Your mother wears Army Boots", a game learned in elementary school boys and some 30 years later the player is 3 Ft taller and still playing the game. Insults without relevence, exchange back and forth, until one of the players, throws up his hands in exhaustion and the remaining player declares victory. jlallen has been playing "Your mother wears Army Boots" all his life, you can put it on his grave marker, because he is going to play it the rest of his life. Nothing more and nothing less. jttmab P.S. I don't care whether it's a left, right, or center article. When I see phrases quoting proposals of a passed event with no mention of what is adopted; the author might as well have said, This article [research] is rigged, you idiot.