Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (44324)	7/11/2001 4:37:19 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

Eric- Bottom line is Nokia HAD TO SIGN if it wants to sell WCDMA, PERIOD. Q gets a lump sum and Nok pays same old royalties. This is no partnership. Nothing is different than before. The only thing this did was expose another Nokia lie that Nokia didn't need another license agreement with Qualcomm. Oh wait, I guess Q was mad and made them throw in a little GSM ipr! Forgot to mention that. And since I am in the pointing out Nokia lies mood, look closely on slide 22 and 23: uwcc.org Are you telling me that slide 22 isn't BS and fluff? On slide 23, you believe that GSM has in anyway the capacity of CDMA2000 1X? Give me a break. Cax