Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (18043)	7/11/2001 11:11:50 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

One in my column I don't think so. Karen

To: The Philosopher who wrote (18043)	7/12/2001 1:52:32 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Religious law is regarded as absolute and immutable; change is regarded as heresy." "It changes because it was not made by God. It was made by people ..." Don't you see the difference between "is regarded as" and "is"? The religious pretend that their laws are absolute and immutable - they regard them as absolute and immutable - because they could not otherwise maintain the pretense that these laws come from God. How they manage to maintain this pretence in the face of constant change is beyond me, but that is beside the point. Religious laws are regarded as absolute and immutable. They are in fact nothing of the kind, but they are still perceived - regarded - as such, at least by the religious. When you say "regarded as", you speak of perception, not of truth. I'm sure you realize that they are in no way the same thing.