Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Puck who wrote (13609)	7/12/2001 10:02:00 AM
From: mightylakers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

Puck Motorola claims to be (and is) the leading GPRS handset vendor The deep distrust toward Mot is shared by all of us<ggg> Also if Mot is the leading something then there will be very little reason to worry<vbg>

To: Puck who wrote (13609)	7/12/2001 2:17:23 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 34857

Puck- Seriously, Nokia lies. Business is Business but lying is lying. You guys are in denial about your favorite company. Two questions: 1. Did Nokia IR say or not say they needed no additional license form Qualcomm? 2. Are those slides I linked BS or what? Figure it out. Nok is scared to death they can't get GPRS or WCDMA to work and are over promising in hopes of keeping customers, "commit to us and we will figure it out later." That is a dangerous strategy and the market is slowly figuring it out. Nok made a 52 week low yesterday. I still can't see how anyone in their right mind can have confidence in Nokia and WCDMA when they can't even get a IS-95a chip right. Geez! Watch your butt, Nokia sure won't. Caxton

To: Puck who wrote (13609)	7/12/2001 2:20:28 PM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

Poor Boy, you want your ball back? lol!

To: Puck who wrote (13609)	7/12/2001 3:54:39 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34857

This is the original anti-Nokia stream Puck and you came along and polluted it. You can't tell US to go away. Did you really think SI discussions are supposed to be corporate public relations style full of anodyne happy-items? EriQ, PCSTEL, GG and other arch villains find all sorts of faults but remain highly valued contributors. Unfortunately for you, you are not in that category of high quality. That's why you are banned from here. We have been here since 1996 and you just arrived in 1999, you miasma of muck, a hagfish called Puck, down on his luck. We hereby chuck, so you'd better duck, or be crunched in the ruck. Now I am stuck, for how do I tuck, that rude word -uck into a cool post? Oh, what the heck, you suck! There, I wrote it. By the way Puck, didn't you know it's against SI terms of use to use abusive language the way you did; calling us fools, etc. You are supposed to play the ball, not the man. Yes, yes, I know it's been a long tradition here for obnoxious comments from both sides. But I've been scrupulously polite [though I have now had to respond to your continual and even continuous belligerence]. Mq