SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (18070)7/12/2001 1:43:04 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Glad you posted that. I keep looking for examples of liberal bias so let's talk about this one.

<<Big network anchors and reporters cheer stories and public figures they like and skewer stories and public figures they dislike. Typical of this approach was Bob Schieffer's comment on the June 21 "CBS Evening News.'' Speaking of the "patients' bill of rights,'' Schieffer said: "Reformers want to give patients who are denied coverage the right to sue their HMO in state courts, and that's the hang-up. Most Republicans believe that would just drive up costs. They want to cap damages and try the cases in federal court. Reformers say that would take too long since federal dockets are already so crowded.'' Reformers (good people) vs. Republicans (bad people). Get it?>>

Yeah, I get it. But it's mistaken, IMO. This paragraph lays out the issues just fine, I think, and so apparently does the article's author. The article takes exception to the juxtaposition of reformer vs. Republican. The problem is, I don't know how to say it any better. Instead of "reformers" they could have said "reformers, which in includes Democrats and some Republicans" of simply "Democrats and some Republicans" but it seems obvious that that's what was meant and words aren't wasted on half hour news shows. I think you'd have to be looking for it to see liberal bias there. How would you have said it?

Karen