Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (13651)	7/12/2001 6:06:44 PM
From: mightylakers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

Eric, Q FUD and N FUD Q FUD is like me saying Lakers gonna three peat next year. N FUD is like Jerry Clause talking about Championship VBG

To: Eric L who wrote (13651)	7/13/2001 6:22:27 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34857

<Was Qualcomm lying when they said that in writing to the world? > No.

To: Eric L who wrote (13651)	7/13/2001 11:39:05 AM
From: Caxton Rhodes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

Eric- You have atough time playing both sides of the fence. Bottom line is CDMA is far superoir to GSM in about every way. That is why the mobile voice/data suppliers have decided to adopt it. Let me ask you this, which is the better technology? cdma2000 or WCDMA? Which is more cost effective? Those Nokia slides are intended to mislead and their is no doubt about that. The GSM crowd made great business moves with GSM proliferation. However they ingnored and bashed cdma because they couldn't make it work and when someone did it was serous compettition. Now that cdma is proven to be the best tecnology for mobile voice and data, they claim they now undeerstand it and can do it better. Yes that is their lie. As far a Qualcomm bashing WCDMA compared to CDMA2000, they still do, but if carriers make the mistake of going to WCDMA anyway, Qualcomm will be there to help them out. That is there tone down. BTW - "Right now, the confidence in Nokia's management is at a many-year low," said Johan Brostroem, an analyst with Hagstromer & Qviberg in Stockholm. "People, including myself, are going to be quite skeptical of their statements." Question is, will Nokia follow the way of Mot. Caxton