Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (47350)	7/12/2001 7:06:32 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Joe, <more painful than the current price war that Intel started in order to maintain the 100% of the business segment> There it is again, the notion that Intel "started" the price war just to maintain or increase market share. Funny how Jerry Sanders has gone from "Don't wrestle with pigs" to "Well the pigs started it." Tenchusatsu P.S. - I'm not familiar with the battle between teachers unions and vouchers. But my guess is that this hardly applies to Intel vs. AMD. People aren't forced to support Intel with high taxes, and AMD isn't arguing for "vouchers" to get people to switch away from Intel. Yet.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (47350)	7/12/2001 11:05:42 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 275872

more painful than the current price war that Intel started in order to maintain the 100% of the business segment. There you guys go again with that nonsense. Intel cannot start a price war by setting their prices above the competition any more than you can start a shooting war by hurling your cities into the path of an incoming ICBM. AMD starts all price wars by undercutting Intel's prices. Intel responds in the spirit of true competition and you scream dirty pool! Get a clue... EP