SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (47529)7/13/2001 1:51:18 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Tualatin is about 85 sq. mm. - it has 512 K L2 cache - but Desktops will have only half that cache enables.

DaDooWrongWrongs are over 100 sq. mm..


So Intel's newest chip on a process just now being brought on-line at a cost of $2 Billion to $3 Billion per updated FAB is a little smaller and (on some code) slightly faster than AMD's slowest, entry level, chip produced with AMD's oldest process - a plant and process so out of date that it's being shutdown for CPUs next year (and converted to flash).

And it's still almost as small and fast as the parts Intel is just now getting into production with new process capacity just now being brought on-line.

Congratulations!



To: Paul Engel who wrote (47529)7/13/2001 4:09:39 PM
From: combjellyRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
"Coppermine is now about 90 sq.. mm"

So 90 vs. 100mm^2 makes it a lot cheaper to manufacture? Really?

Besides, wouldn't Intel use the 256k version of Tualatin for something like this?