russwinter,
Since i do not engage in the type of activity this thread supports,
the trading of gold and silver mining stocks, with it seems
most all mentioned and studied being gold.
I who is a very very slow reader with bad English grammer
only look at these posts for key words related to battles
between Good & Evil (so far not found), and characters
as in letters for stock symbols for those dozen or two in
the toilet penny companies i hold (only x-cal mentioned),
and any opportunity that come my way to act like a child
and say outloud that certain posters "wear no cloths."
So here i arrived, not to say that you "wear no cloths",
but actually just the opposite. Its summer atime here
in the usa, and your Silicon Profile has the following
placing you in a desert in New Mexico that is not showned
on any map, so i say that you "wear too many cloths."
Name: russwinter
Member Since: 09/09/99
Company/Occupation/Title: Redeveloper, venture capital
Age: 49
Location: Area 51
Experience: 25 years, former stockbroker 15 years
Interests and Hobbies: Scripophily (tea leaf reading using popcorn)
By this it appears that you have placed onto this thread
the stuff one would expect to receive in exchange for money,
but here it is for free.
Is this true, that you are actually supplying the type of information
that readers to this thread can use to make educated decisions
to trade these companies. It should go without saying that
what you place here should be investigated further by anyone
wishing to act on your posts, along with the understanding
that what others do with your posts is their responsibility totally
and if they can not handle that aspect, then its their problem
as it is made very clear in the Silicon Investor's introduction
that this is the environment here, and for anyone saying that
they did not read that intro, then stupid in stupid out.
Speaking of stupid reminds me of myself, as i just realized
that there are two russ-names on this thread, and hopefully
i am not making a complete jack-@ss of myself eventhought
many have expressed the opinion that its a given everytime
i post, but are you the one with those recent detailed posts
that include a roadmap of sort using Good... Bad... Ugly...?
At first using my fast reading i thought you were reposting
the same post over and over but then noticed changes.
Now is it possible that this babbling post of mine has a question
or point to make is probability a non issue since most all readers
have already done an neXt on it.
But incase you is still reading, i bring up the same point i made
a while back, in that for example Claude is knowned to have
a pay to view newsletter that includes a focus being identical
to the purpose of this thread, but as noted by i he is restricted
from posting relevant information from his knowledge base used
to create his 4Sale product. Example, in the past years i have
more than once asked opinions about the Canadian company Tyhee
of which i hold shares and have even created a thread for.
After no replies from anyone i then asked Claude directly
for his opinion, and he replies that it was not on his list
of those he tracks, but he would look into it and get back to me.
Now before i go further, to me excuses do not exist,
only reasons which do not include "too busy", "forgot"
or "You do not have Silicon Investor's Private Message
feature On."
A "too busy" can be used, but not as an excuse simply
by informing the "waiting person" that it has been decided
not to allocate any time to address you request. This is
what i see as "telling the truth" rather than letting that
person wait and wait for a reply while this person alread
knows he will not send one. The "too busy" can also be
used, but again not as an excuse since all here do not have
enough time to do all things on one's list and must either
just do them without a plan and become knowed as unreliable,
or if the list is written down and weight given to each item,
then if my request was at the bottom and clear that it would
not be acted upon, then without a note saying so to me is
a person not being truthful.
So here i am, this thread knows Claude has what it takes
to identify companies as watch/buy/hold/sell, and if one
asks Claude about a specific company as i did with Tyhee,
and no reply is given after months, then what can be assumed.
Could Claude tell me "I looked into Tyhee and added it to my
pay per view newsletter and not able to disclose it status."
Fine, no problem and let the chips fall where they may.
Might Claude recommend that i ask his pay to view web site
to send me a free last week/month copy.
Sure, but i posted here for direct open to public to see what
he has to say about Tyhee, as this is the overall purpose of
Silicon Investor to exchange market stuff so that others can
receive it and comment or supply more or counter information.
Once again, why post on this thread with restrictions that are
not displayed each time you post at the bottom of your post
with a Warning type claimer saying that your response may be
interpretative as a negative sign on the company asked about
by you through another. Many people just read this thread,
and every day may include brand new people that have no
knowledge that Claude has a pay to view newsletter, and his
reply as a non reply to Tyhee where he does have an near 100%
reply rate to others, might give the impression Tyhee = "something wrong."
Oops, sure his SI profile has that pay to view web site link,
but is that only obtained after clicking and going there,
as in is there a message saying "I Claude..."
So here i wonder, you supply what appears to me detail info
with expressed opinions, and if the Claude types that have
that ability keep quiet and do not comment and expand on
what you present, then their lack of response to what you
post could be their impression that you are a Dummy and
are spouting Garbage.
Just wondering, not for myself but those read only folks
that may have just joined this thread in the past weeks
and see your detaied stuff "ignored" by those who seem
to be on top of this stuff.
TruTh - many have their own definitions to keep them sin'less
enough
ak |
