barron's trader col... EMC Warns and Techs Swoon
By Andrew Bary
Vital Signs
Stocks fell back into a funk last week following a series of profit disappointments that were capped by warning from former technology stalwart EMC.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbled 227 points Friday to 10,252, bringing its loss for the week to 250 points, or 2.4%. The Nasdaq got clocked in the holiday-shortened week, dropping 156 points, or 7.2%, to 2004, including a 76-point setback Friday. The S&P 500 was off 2.8% to 1190.
Wall Street has alternately focused on the potential for higher corporate profits in 2002 stemming from the Federal Reserve's aggressive easing actions this year and a seemingly constant stream of punk earnings news. This past week, the poor profit reports dominated as Federated Department Stores, Advanced Micro Devices, EMC and British telecommunications equipment maker Marconi warned of weak second-quarter profits, prompting analysts to cut their estimates for 2001 and 2002.
"The bear case for the economy got reinforced," says Byron Wien, chief domestic strategist at Morgan Stanley. Wien noted that employment data for June released Friday morning showed a larger-than-expected drop in payroll jobs of 114,000 and an uptick in the jobless rate to 4.5% from 4.4% in May. Wien says that while the April lows are apt to hold, he doesn't see much appreciation potential for stocks in the second half, in contrast to bullish strategists like Goldman Sachs' Abby Jospeh Cohen, who sees the S&P reaching 1550 by year-end-30% above current levels.
The EMC news late Thursday rocked the tech sector Friday and prompted a drop of more than eight points in EMC's stock, which finished the week at 21.60, down 7.65. IBM and Sun Microsystems, both hardware makers, fell sharply Friday in sympathy with EMC as IBM declined 5.60 to 106.50 and Sun gave up 1.49 to 13.68. EMC, the leading producer of data-storage systems, warned that its second-quarter profits would total four-to-six cents, far short of the consensus estimate of 17 cents, and that revenues would total $2 billion in the period, below the projected $2.3 billion.
EMC had been one of the tech Fab Five in late 1999 and early 2000 along with Oracle, Cisco Systems, Sun Microsystems and Nortel Networks, and it was the last to feel the effects of the tech spending slowdown. EMC peaked at 105 in September and traded as high as 80 in January. As recently as late 2000, EMC partisans figured that the company was a cinch to earn $1 a share this year, up from last year's 79 cents, and that optimism lasted into the first quarter.
Yet Street analysts now see EMC generating profits of just 35-40 cents this year, and some cut their 2002 projections to around 50 cents from 80 cents. EMC has dominated the market for high-end data-storage systems, but its lush profits margins, which hit 60% in the second quarter last year, attracted a slew of competitors. Michael Dell, the chief executive of Dell Computer, which has been moving into the storage area, reportedly has called EMC "Excessive Mark-Up Corp."
The EMC news highlighted both the risks for bargain hunters in the tech sector and the industry's high operating leverage. EMC's revenues in the just-concluded quarter were $300 million below expectations -- not a huge amount, but virtually all that decline affected its bottom line as profit estimates fell to about a nickel from 17 cents. One of the less-heralded dangers in the tech sector is margin compression as rivals in increasingly crowded fields like data storage, telecommunications equipment and even software vie for a dwindling amount of business.
Ross Margolies, manager of the Salomon Brothers Capital fund, says all the investors trying to pick the low point in tech stocks and the inflection point in their businesses may be in for a rude surprise. The revenue and profit base, he says, may be so low at the bottom that the stocks may not move up when the recovery does come. Many semiconductor companies are experiencing 50% revenue declines from year-ago levels. "Once people realize that these companies aren't going to have 50% recurring annual growth off the bottom, they're going to be disappointed," he says.
Margolies also argues that the EMC debacle and all the other tech disasters underscore the industry's economic sensitivity, which argues against premium price/earnings multiples. "If you want to buy cyclical companies, you ought to consider Federated Department Stores or Alcoa, which have dominant positions and far lower valuations."
The EMC blowup also suggests that investors should look at tech companies' price/sales ratios, which are derived by dividing market value by annual revenues. Sectors with high price/sales ratios, such as software and data storage, tend to- have high margins. Just look at Microsoft's monopolistic 90% gross margins. Yet high-margin companies tend to attract numerous rivals, although none so far have threatened Microsoft.
The accompanying table shows the current price/sales ratios of some major tech companies and the 10-year average. Microsoft, Oracle and EMC trade above their 10-year averages and are potentially vulnerable to narrowing margins or P/E compression. Hewlett-Packard, Compaq and Gateway have low price/sales ratios and trade below their 10-year average. They would appear to have less risk than their more highly valued peers. If major tech stocks traded at their 10-year averages, Compaq, H-P and Gateway would rise, while Microsoft, Oracle, Intel and EMC would fall. Cisco trades for around six times sales, below its 10-year average of 11 and a peak of 35 in early 2000. The average tech company tracked by Merrill Lynch trades for 4.5 times trailing 12-month sales, slightly above the 10-year average. |