SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (47)7/13/2001 10:59:11 PM
From: Sarkie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1669
 
Hi ya Gloopy.

What he has been proven guilty of is adultery, which in my rule book, in inexcusable.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (47)7/13/2001 11:05:57 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1669
 
Agree, AG.... But there are several things...

1) If he was such a good friend, and her Congressman in addition, why hasn't he even said a word publically...??

2) Knowing what he knew about his and her personal relationship, wouldn't you think he would have talked to the police immediately, and insisted they come IMMEDIATELY to check things out at his DC home??? One really has to ask oneself why that didn't happen.

3) Hiring someone as off-setting as Abbe Lowell is strange to me. Lowell may be smart, but this is a missing person case, and perhaps a homocide case. One would think there might be some visual and verbal awareness of that on his part.

I personally don't believe Condit himself did away with her. But I also don't believe he has gone out of his way to help find her, either.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (47)7/13/2001 11:14:35 PM
From: Carolyn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1669
 
Yes, Gloopie, you are right. But we can speculate, which is what we are doing.

If ever someone is charged, if a crime has been committed, should indeed get a fair trial. (OJ did.)

But he is an adulterer, more than once, which gives off a few fumes.



To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (47)7/14/2001 3:43:37 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1669
 
He's a politician. How could he possibly be innocent?