SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rich4eagle who wrote (160685)7/13/2001 11:09:48 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
The term abortion defines precisely the facts of the situation- The aborting of human life (which is already alive, thus an abortion of that life).

Twist it as you will. It's still killing.

~SB~



To: rich4eagle who wrote (160685)7/13/2001 11:25:51 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
Dear richie, >>>> nice post on a subject that has no answer, the abortion issue and when life begins is a "chicken and egg" problem and is unanswerable,

richie I know you are not pretending ignorance about a scientific certainty."

Well richie for the truly totally technically illiterate that is the case. So I understand why this kind of testimony is so confusing to you.

When does life begin?

In 1981 (April 23-24) a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee held hearings on the very
question before us here: When does human life begin? Appearing to speak on behalf of
the scientific community was a group of internationally-known geneticists and
biologists who had the same story to tell, namely, that human life begins at
conception - and they told their story with a profound absence of opposing testimony.

Dr. Micheline M. Mathews-Roth, Harvard medical School, gave confirming testimony,
supported by references from over 20 embryology and other medical textbooks that
human life began at conception.

"Father of Modern Genetics" Dr. Jerome Lejeune told the lawmakers: "To accept the
fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no
longer a matter of taste or opinion ... it is plain experimental evidence."

Dr. Hymie Gordon, Chairman, Department of Genetics at the Mayo Clinic, added: "By all
the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of
conception."

Dr. McCarthy de Mere, medical doctor and law professor, University of Tennessee,
testified: "The exact moment of the beginning of personhood and of the human body is
at the moment of conception."

Dr. Alfred Bongiovanni, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, concluded, "I am
no more prepared to say that these early stages represent an incomplete human being
than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty ... is not a
human being."

Dr. Richard V. Jaynes: "To say that the beginning of human life cannot be determined
scientifically is utterly ridiculous."

Dr. Landrum Shettles, sometimes called the "Father of In Vitro Fertilization" notes,
"Conception confers life and makes that life one of a kind." And on the Supreme Court
ruling _Roe v. Wade_, "To deny a truth [about when life begins] should not be made a
basis for legalizing abortion."

Professor Eugene Diamond: "...either the justices were fed a backwoods biology or they were pretending ignorance about a scientific certainty."

richie I know you are not pretending ignorance about a scientific certainty."

you all have a nice day now hear.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: rich4eagle who wrote (160685)7/13/2001 11:42:50 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Rich:

You are right. There are no real answers because of the differing beliefs of people. What perplexes me is how the Courts can reconcile their view on abortion with so many other holdings that allow government to control our lives.

Little joe



To: rich4eagle who wrote (160685)7/14/2001 12:24:46 AM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
when life begins is a "chicken and egg" problem and is unanswerable

Unanswerable?

You may not know this, but that argument is the basis of an entire "branch" of philosophy.

Not only is it weak, it is totally, completely wrong.

You should find a better argument.