SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (2345)7/14/2001 3:00:04 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
I didn't say the writer was Islamic. I said the source was Radio Islam - which it is. I have no idea why the writer wrote what he wrote. But I do know why Radio Islam gave him a forum.

I'll tell you who I would find credible. A Protestant or Catholic Biblical professor who is on the tenured faculty of a mainstream university here in the US. I've been looking.

I input the search terms "jesus talmud" on google, and am looking for .edu URLs. So far, the only one I've seen was one that was publishing works from the Islamic point of view.

Will keep looking for a bit longer - but after I've looked at 200, I'm calling it a night.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (2345)7/14/2001 3:27:55 AM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 23908
 
Now this seems to be a pretty cool guy - Eliezer Segal, teaches at University of Calgary. Why don't you write to him and ask him whether Professor Shahak is telling the truth?

acs.ucalgary.ca



To: Thomas M. who wrote (2345)7/14/2001 3:33:17 AM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 23908
 
Here is something from the Nizkor Project:

>>
In the Adelaide Institute's April 1996 issue, I found the
following letter, worthy of sharing with both our friends
and foes alike...

Since you are so disturbed about "hate propaganda", I enclose
details of the Jewish Talmud, which has been distributing hate
against the "goyim"...

So the Zundel mob has decided to publish lies about the Talmud. The
Talmud is not "hate propaganda," but this letter that the Zundelistas
find to be so "worthy" is indeed hate propaganda at its worst.

...(itself a hateful term, since it means "human cattle",
the Jews only permitting themselves to be fully human).

This lie has been exposed innumerable times in this newsgroup. The
word, "Goyim," means "nations" in Hebrew and "non-Jews" in Yiddish.
It does not, nor has it ever meant "human cattle!" The fact that the
author grasps at such straws to "prove" his case only confirms that
the Talmud itself has precious little in it worthy of criticism.

Furthermore, the Talmud mnever refers to Christians as "goyim" for
the simple reason that at that time Christianity was still considered
a schismatic sect of Judaism! All references to "Goyim" in the
Talmud are references to local idolators, or to the occupying Roman
forces.

I draw your attention, for example, to the hate mongering and
blasphemous reference to Christ as the illegitimate son of a
liaison of intercourse between His mother, Mary, and Pandira,
a Roman soldier. Christ is also called a "fool" who "corrupts
his morals and dishonours himelf" and "died like a beast and is
buried in an animal's dirt heap".

As the Talmud never uses the words, "Christ," or "Jesus," these
references are particularly specious. What it amounts to is
speculation that these passages refer to Christ, as scholars, both
Jewish and Christian, will attest.

The "died like a beast" reference is interesting in that it was a
given of Jewish theology that God protects his saints from harm at
the hands of idolators. The early Christians themselves were
embarassed by the manner of Jesus' death, as it was taught that a
violent death such as his would never be visited upon a true saint.

Hateful references to Christians as "idolaters",...

This is truly ignorant. The Talmud refers to idolators and the
Zundelistas read this to be a reference to Christians! In fact, the
Talmud never even uses the word, "Christian." The Talmud does refer
to "heretics" but scholars will attest that this can refer to either
Gnostics or Christians or both, and it is never clear-cut which group
is meant in any particular passage. But neither group is identified
as idolatrous.

...Christians "have sex with animals",...

Not Christians -- idolators!

...Jews are "innocent of murder if intended to kill a
Christian".

An outright lie. It does not even apply to idolators.

This is of course an incitement to murder. Christians idoleters
likened to cows and asses;...

Once again, Christians are not identified with idolators.

...Christians are like unclean beasts; non-Jews' souls go
straight to hell. Jews can lie and perjure to condemn a
Christian; name of God not profaned when lying to Christians;
and Jews can perjure themselves with a clear conscience. The
last is, of course, an incitement to lie and cheat.

Wrong again. Jews are not permitted to lie even to an idolator.

The Zundelistas end their litany of lies with this pithy semtiment:

Thought for the Day:

"Rather perish than hate and fear, and twice rather perish than
make oneself hated and feared."

(Friedrich Nietzsche)

A noble philosophy. Too bad the Zundelistas do not adhere to it,
instead of hypocritically giving it lip service. Spreading lies and
distortions about the Talmud is guaranteed to make the Zundelistas
"hated and feared." Neitzche himself condemned the German people of
his time who allowed themselves to be deceived by anti-Semites and
Jew-haters.

--
Harry Katz

Ignorance and conceit go hand in hand.
-- The Wit and Wisdom of the Talmud, Madison C. Peters, ed.<<

veritas.nizkor.org



To: Thomas M. who wrote (2345)7/14/2001 3:58:55 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
More debunking:

talmud.faithweb.com

geocities.com

Good enough for me. Calling it a night.