Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (139197)	7/14/2001 6:12:33 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

Re: "I'll take, Jerry." Pleade DO!!! I suggest taking him to the nearest DUMP - and bury him there.

To: Dan3 who wrote (139197)	7/14/2001 6:14:10 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Intel's management, OTOH, has demonstrated brilliance during the conference calls, and screwed up timing the semi cycle" Then why do you spend COUNTLESS HOURS making up whiney, erroneous stories about Intel spending money on Brand New Wafer fabs - to position themselves for the next UP semi-cycle ?

To: Dan3 who wrote (139197)	7/15/2001 11:05:07 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan, <<<Sanders has proven himself to be brilliant at timing the semi cycle (during the past few years, at least). He hasn't been what I'd call a shining star while speaking during the earnings reports.>>> Why are you so enamored of this guy? You work harder than any PR person I know and you do a much better job than most. You are almost a 24/7 PR person. Sanders couldn't pay enough for what you do for him. The question I have is, why? Jerry Sanders has a long track record. Jerry Sanders rewards himself before he rewards shareholders. There is a history where when AMD was losing money and share prices plummeted, Jerry Sanders was very generously rewarded. He has done this more than once. There is a history of second in command at AMD, with everyone leaving not on good terms. Why can't you find a more deserving person to promote? You have a lot to contribute, but Jerry Sanders does not seem to be a person that is deserving the passion and the loyalty that you are so capable of. Perhaps I am all wrong about Jerry Sanders. Perhaps you could straighten me out. Just what is it about this person that seem to attract such zealous support from so many people? So many people want to see him rewarded monetarily personally regardless what happens to shareholders. Mary