Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (160999)	7/15/2001 1:03:53 AM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

As opposed to all embryos being lost? ~SB~

To: TigerPaw who wrote (160999)	7/15/2001 1:08:23 AM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

My position has long-been, that the embryo is not viable until it has attached to the uterus (and then subject to many natural variables). A fertilized egg does not make a viable embryo in my book (to be contrary to some on this thread whom you might consider to be my bretheren). In that sense, I am for RU-486 as a "reasonable compromise". Otherwise, I find it impossible to draw lines clear enough that do not trample the rights of the unborn. I am a Constitutionalist. ~SB~