Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Street who wrote (4964)	7/15/2001 10:44:37 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Uh, all those can be looked upon as Original Intent-- don't even say that the State Constitutions did not look at Original Intent when they drafted their constitutions. That is laughable... What's laughable is that you STILL fail to understand that the only the United States Supreme Court has the authority to interpret the Constitution. The States do not. Whether or not the States considered original intent [of which you have not offered one iota of proof] is irrelevant. The Supreme Court determines intent of the Framers. Again, the States do not. Since the States are not a Constitutional Authority in interpreting the 2nd, any interpretation they may have had does not constitute any proof of original Intent. I'll cut a deal with you. We'll offer the above statement to Gordon Langston on this thread for consideration. If he says I'm wrong, I'll accept that and state that I'm wrong. If he says that I'm correct than you accept that and state that you were wrong. Edit: I'll accept a fuzzy answer, basically or generally right or wrong. I'm flexible. I have no problem saying I'm wrong. Let Gordon be the impartial judge [Gordon, you are impartial?] Deal? jttmab