Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (138157)	7/15/2001 3:49:02 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1584438

Ted Re..Harry, who said Udell is any judge of intelligence? <<<<<<<<< At this stage, I certainly would consider Udell a better judge than you, as Udell has met GW personally, and as his commander should know his aptitude. If you still think Gw is stupid read this. http://www.businessweek.com/@@PkEidGYQS6mXHgkA/premium/content/01_30/c3742073.htm JULY 23, 2001 Washington Outlook Edited by Richard S. Dunham Printer-Friendly Version E-Mail This Story What's Greener and Has Legs? Bush's Energy Plan Outreach, Microsoft Style What's Greener and Has Legs? Bush's Energy Plan For much of George W. Bush's first six months, energy policy has been an oily albatross around his neck. The President's plans to step up drilling on federal lands, expand nuclear power, soften environmental safeguards, and increase refinery capacity were panned by the public and marked the abrupt end of his honeymoon. With Bush being bashed as a shill for Big Oil, you'd think his energy plan would be dead and buried. Well, think again. Three unexpected events have converged to alter the landscape dramatically. First, Bush has responded to slipping polls by shifting his rhetoric from boosting the energy supply to energy efficiency and conservation--which puts him on the same page as congressional Democrats and GOP moderates. "Their energy policy is no longer exclusively supply-oriented," says Representative Sherwood L. Boehlert (N.Y.), a prominent pro-environment Republican. "The policy that's evolving will be significantly improved." In addition, the falling prices of natural gas and gasoline in recent weeks have alleviated the crisis atmosphere on Capitol Hill and prompted both sides to tone down the blame game. Finally, because of the Democratic takeover of the Senate, Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), a business-friendly consensus-builder, replaces pro-oil stalwart Frank H. Murkowski (R-Alaska) atop the Senate Energy Committee. Says American Gas Assn. lobbyist Rick Shelby: "There's a real basis for optimism in terms of being able to hammer out a compromise." The endgame for the energy bill can be compared with another issue close to Bush's heart: education. Just as the President backed away from school vouchers for private and religious schools, he may give up on drilling Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and on protected federal lands. At the same time, Democrats appear prepared to give ground on three of Bush's top priorities: increased oil and gas drilling in the continental U.S., incentives to expand refinery capacity, and the reauthorization of the about-to-expire Price-Anderson Act, which protects nuclear power generators from excessive liability. "My view is that about 90% of what is in his so-called energy plan" is acceptable, Bingaman says. On July 25, the Energy Committee will take up a Bingaman bill that could become the vehicle that all sides use to ride to the finish line. Still, Democrats will push for more conservation provisions than the White House is ready to embrace. They'll try to force auto makers to boost fuel efficiency. And they'll create incentives for companies to build more-efficient appliances. GLARING OMISSION. There is increasing evidence that the White House is losing its fighting spirit over what once was a cornerstone of the Bush agenda. On July 9, Bush urged Congress to act on his top priorities: education, a patients' bill of rights, and faith-based initiatives. The glaring omission of energy left many industry reps quaking in their boots. "We're concerned that the White House is backing off," says one lobbyist. And Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle told BusinessWeek on July 10 that "there's a good deal of consultation" between the White House and Democrats. "I'm hopeful we can find as much opportunity on energy as we did on education," he said. With an attitude like that, the outcome could be an energy plan that generates broad bipartisan support--as long as the White House remains willing to settle for a bit less than a full tank. Bush would get most of what he wants, he could declare victory over the energy crisis, and he could insulate himself from charges that he is a pawn of Big Oil. It seems like a no-brainer. By Laura Cohn, with Lorraine Woellert and John Carey <<<<<<<<< Looks like Gw will get 90% of what he wants on energy. And if Gw solves the energy problem, you can bet he will solve the next election. And if its a setup, then its seriously manipulative and dishonest. Stupid and manipulative and dishonest all fall in the same category for me....qualities I would not want to see in a president.<<<<< And you call Gw stupid. Of course it is a setup. Jeb, by objecting gets kudos from Fl. voters. GW by acceding partly to Jebs wishes, pays him back for help in election. Both get most of what they want; and you dems. seem to be none the wiser. Just as the previous article pointed out, GW is running you guys around in circles. GW sets a tough target, gives you dems a few whacks, then modestly concedes a few crumbs, gets 90% of what he wants and both sides declare victory. Politics at its finest.