Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (261)	7/15/2001 2:56:35 PM
From: 249443	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

"There's nothing faulty with requesting that he take a polygraph since the information that he's provided to the police has been false. The use of the polygraph does not have to be to ascertain whether he's guilty, but the veracity of the facts surrounding background of her disapperance. They probably wouldn't have resorted to this tool if he had been forthright in the first place, let alone try to get someone else to make false statements to the police." Nothing faulty -- yes you are correct. Is there anything faulty with Mr. Condit protecting his rights when the media is on a witch hunt for him? But charge him or say he is a suspect. Was he under oath when he gave supposedly "false information"? Has he been obsructing justice? Has he a part in the crime? Is there proof he was involved in a murder or crime? If so, charge him with a crime and prosecute. Sentence him to life or give him a death penalty if that's what you seek. But first at least state he is a suspect or state evidence/witness points to him as a guilty party or, at the very least, an accomplice. I hope I never have to take a lie detector test. If I was asked, I would take advice from Abbee. Assuming a crime (perhaps murder) has been committed, everyone that knows her should be a suspect. If the police can not state this and do consider Mr. Condit a suspect, then they are playing legal shenanigans. Would I take a lie detector test for someone playing with my rights -- no.