Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (18285)	7/15/2001 8:26:36 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

I suspect that you are as aware as I of the science involved. We know that women are human in the same way that we know that a chihuahua is a dog and not an overgrown rat. There are these classifications, you see, called "species", that we have decided upon, because they makes sense, and there are criteria, set by people that devote their lives to studying such things, that determine which species, and according to those criteria, women fit quite clearly in the species we call "human". I actually don't think you would find anybody willing to seriously challenge this classification, though you might find some who believe that femal members of the human species ought to be treated differently than male members of the human species. Remember these things. Every belief, no matter how thoroughly implanted, no matter how basic, can be questioned. I am tempted to say "must be questioned", simply becasue if you haven't questioned it, you don't really believe it. You just accept it. They can also be changed. Many of us here were raised with certain culturally imprinted basic, fundamental beliefs that we later rejected. The belief in a God, for example...