Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (433)	7/15/2001 11:09:37 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 1669

But he is a member of the democratic party right? Or am I mistaken?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (433)	7/15/2001 11:15:59 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

I guess the point here Ken is that while I don't think we should jump to conclusions I also think it's disingenuous of the democrats to distance themselves now. Make no mistake about it - The Democratic party played a roll in his re-election. This includes funding. Does this make them guilty of anything? No. But the jumping of sinking ships doesn't do much for me. I'm not about to cut either side of this issue an ounce of slack. The Republicans should take NO joy in this and the Democrats should not be allowed by the press to distance themselves period.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (433)	7/16/2001 9:53:15 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

>>Yes, you did miss something - All those votes he cast with the Republicans. They will miss him more than the Democrats. You always miss something and you are wrong just as reliably. Condit is a moderate/liberal Dem. - not a conservative by any means. ACU rating 49 ADA rating 70 ciponline.org The GOP will not miss Condit as that district as currently composed will elect a Republican to replace him. That's why the Dems have supported Condit so visibly.