SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jurgis Bekepuris who wrote (44506)7/21/2001 10:21:53 PM
From: Dinesh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Hi Jurgis

I agree with you in that the total return always depends
on not only the quality of the tools one has at his or her
disposition but also on the amount of effort one is willing
to put in learning how to use them.

I have found Lynch's book to be an excellent guide for one
to develop a personal framework for investing -- something
that darbyc apparently was groping for. He had started
investing recently, went with the flow and didn't know what
to do when the total return started going negative.

No doubt many of old time investors had similar issues in
their portfolios. But they had learned to deal with it. In
other words, they knew why they invested, they understood
the risks, their ability to cope with the risks, and finally
not totally fall apart if those risks do materialize. This
is what I like to call a framework for investing and it is
a very personal thing. *What* sector one invests in, and
what *vehicle* one picks for that purpose are mere details
within this context.

Lynch's book made one aware of these issues and forced one
to reconcile with them. Therefore, my recommendation for
the book.

I like Peter Lynch, so I should also like to point out that
he did not recommend merely buying what one knew but to use
that as the starting point in beginning one's research. I
don't think there is anything wrong with that advice. What
would you rather have darbyc buy? How can he investigate a
company/area without having a sense for what are the various
toronados buzzing around, leave alone the odds of spotting
one? True, it will limit one's investment horizons a bit
but that can hardly be such a handicap. To wit, Buffet has
made a point of not investing in computing technology (to
distinguish it from say bottling technologies) even though
it has served many an investors quite all right.

I do tend to agree with you that most good books on
investing are supposed to be incredible bores. This is but
human nature and only means better odds for people with
a little bit of patience ::)

regards
-D