Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (516)	7/16/2001 8:52:02 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 1669

Mrs. Peel for President!!!!! It has a nice ring to it.....<g> GZ

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (516)	7/16/2001 9:18:33 PM
From: 249443	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

My Opinion of Mr. Condit: Condit does have rights. My opinion is that Mr. Condit was involved in the disappearance of Chandra. He acts like a guilty person: hiring a lawyer immediately, asking other sexual partners to deny relationships, etc. I believe that the police department did a terrible job with the investigation -- to Mr. Condit's benefit. I believe that the police department should have performed a complete sweep of Mr. Condit's apartment within 72 hours of an official missing person status. But they did not. I believe it is too late to look for clues, 10 weeks, in Mr. Condit's apartment. But these are only opinions. Mr. Condit will be ultimately convincted only on facts. I have yet to see any facts that would convict him. My opinion is that the police messed up the case and it is possible a guilty man will go free because of kid-gloving a politician. As the old saying goes it is better that 1,000 guilty men go free than 1 innocent man go to prison. Show me facts. That's what decides law and decides who is convicted. GZ: These are only my opinions. I have never tried to state that my opinion is worth more credibility than another.