Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (59932)	7/17/2001 4:36:38 AM
From: Joseph Pareti	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74651

theregister.co.uk

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (59932)	7/17/2001 4:41:35 AM
From: Joseph Pareti	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Message 16085508

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (59932)	7/17/2001 9:12:53 PM
From: keithsha	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74651

Whoohaah. J2ee adds xml support about 3 years late. It's dying it's deserved death. Sucking thousands into developing to a losing cause for political coolness. It kills me that “innovative” Sun and the Java community rip off MSFT and W3C specs as their own in J2EE after about a year or more in most cases. And then try to position themselves as innovators with this disingenuous claptrap propagated by sycophants such as you. It is obvious with these approximate dates: MSFT OBDC 1992 Sunw JDBC 1996 MSFT ASP 12\96 SUNW JSP 10\98 MST ADSI 03\97 SUNW JNDI 4\98 MSFT MSMQ 7\97 SUNW JMS 7\98 MSFT MTS 11\97 SUNW EJB 09\98 MSFT MSXML 12\98 SUNW JAXP 3\01 The EJB spec even had the same typos as MSFT’s MTS spec. Stop, you are embarassing yourself. keithsha