Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (139448)	7/17/2001 4:43:56 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Maui, Other may be the future if they pick the right others. mike

To: Road Walker who wrote (139448)	7/17/2001 4:58:48 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

John, <<<Other Revenue - $1207 million Op. Loss - $1249 million>>> For every dollar that comes in, 2 dollars are spent. How can I get that job. I think I could do it. I could spend that kind of money. It's probably not as easy as it looks. I mean how many Fendi handbags do I need, or Farragamo Shoes. Maybe I could get Donna Karan to design my corner office. I wonder what Jack Welch would do in this case? Oh, oh, here comes Joe Osha On CNBC. Will he disappoint me? Because of P4, margins are going down to 47% - and not due to losses in the other category. 3rd Q numbers are coming down. Stock is too expensive and is coming down. Talk is cheap. He is not going to buy whatever he is told at the cc. He needs to hear that PC are going to sell better, and he doubts he will hear that. Nothing is going to change his mind. His mind is made up. No surprises. Mary

To: Road Walker who wrote (139448)	7/17/2001 5:07:07 PM
From: Joseph Pareti	Respond to of 186894

>Without "other" Intel would be kicking a--. may be you're right if one looks at the quarter results. Bob Palmer saved his a- for 10 years at Digital by just doing that. (=quarter stuff) Cherry Sanders gets the bucks and moves on while his "brainchild" bleeds cash. The bottom line is (as an investor) : are you inspired by Sanders or/and Palmer ? :-)

To: Road Walker who wrote (139448)	7/17/2001 5:26:14 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: Other Revenue - $1207 million Op. Loss - $1249 million It seems possible that costs aren't perfectly allocated between the IAG and non-IAG groups. :-)

To: Road Walker who wrote (139448)	7/17/2001 5:43:36 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

John and Thread, Okay, even I have had enough with this "Other" category: Other Revenue - $1207 million Op. Loss - $1249 million Moving forward, I'd like to know the breakout of this category. As an aside, rumorville says that Intel may cut a comm division (at least, this is what the employees of that division are thinking.) Regards, Amy J

To: Road Walker who wrote (139448)	7/17/2001 8:31:29 PM
From: jackrabbit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: Other Revenue - $1207 million Op. Loss - $1249 million What a difference a year makes . . . ___________________ To:Diamond Jim who wrote (105842) From: jackrabbit Tuesday, Jul 18, 2000 5:01 PM View Replies (3) \| Respond to of 139500 Why doesn't Intel get out of the side businesses?? Operating profit would have been 35% higher -- $3.36 billion vs. $2.4 billion -- without them. They should at least be like GE -- if you're not #1 or #2 within a short period of time, get out of the business. Anyone disagree?? ____________________ To:jackrabbit who wrote (105856) From: John Fowler Tuesday, Jul 18, 2000 6:41 PM Respond to of 139500 Jackrabbit, Most of Intel's new efforts are related to their PC and Server processor business. Some are projected, by the analysts, to do very well. Andy Bryant said some are profitable. I'm not sure I would feel as comfortable with this investment if they wern't trying to grow the business beyond the microprocessor segment. That's my opinion. That's why I answered your note with "yes", I disagree. John