Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (8122)	7/17/2001 6:44:19 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Tricky Nick, The SEC filings back it up And those same SEC filings contain contradictory information in the "headers" section.. Now whose fault is that? the bigger picture All right, if you are looking for an admission that you, as a person who has probably memorized all 84 of REFR's press releases over the past nine years, are more of an authority on REFR's story, as REFR would have it be told, then you have it. I just have this funny hang-up that a company's press releases just might not be the most objective source of due diligence available.

To: N. Dixon who wrote (8122)	7/17/2001 6:52:32 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Interesting sequence of events: >>>SPD Inc. is shipping film and products this year. refr-spd.com They've expanded facilities refr-spd.com and they have orders Message 16075804 <<<< These new Hangkuk Glass/SPDi orders are specifically for products utilizing REFR technology, under license? It isn't instantly apparent that REFR is getting anything out of this, so I'm asking out of curiousity. Since REFR saw fit to print SPDi's film shipments and expanded facilities, I'd have thought they might see these "orders" as a victory worth mentioning as well. It's an interesting story, to say the least, cautious as I remain.