Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (8128)	7/17/2001 7:49:06 PM
From: Ben Wa	Respond to of 10293

why don't you guys stop arguing about refr and just get the Wall St Journal from January 4th, 2003 and see who's right? I mean, it's so simple and all you guys do is bash each other!

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (8128)	7/17/2001 8:28:21 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 10293

One could just take the word of XX, since XY will always contradict. If 2+2=5 doesn't seem 'quite logical', that can simply be attributed to the "It's-The-Way-I-Feel-Today" corollary. >>> Company A says X as a point of fact concerning itself. Source B says Y about that point of fact. X and Y contradict....if Company A re-asserts X, then X must be presumed correct. <<<<

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (8128)	7/17/2001 11:52:02 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Since the SEC filings back up what THV stated then I go with them. As Bink stated, it is of little consequence to the bigger picture except that it illustrates the desperation of some who need to back up a scenario that is false. SPD products are being commercialized. The list of licensees will grow and announcements of some of Hanglas's end-customers with whom they have been working over the past 4 years will be announced. ND