SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Bearcat (BEA-C) & Stampede (STF-C) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Keith Minler who wrote (2202)7/18/2001 5:15:21 AM
From: Dale Schwartzenhauer  Respond to of 2306
 
I'm with you guys, except I'm a Curlew player by preference. That being said, I track the share prices of BEA/STF through a microscope, and the former is making a major breakout (which means STF by definition can't be far behind). It also means the Turner Valley is for real, as these issues don't have anything else to hang their hats on. I can see BEA moving into the 1.50 - 2.00 range on a very successful flow test, making STF about half that, and CWQ roughly 20% of BEA (0.30-0.40). That should be great for all of us, as STF also owns a bunch of CWQ.

Dale



To: Keith Minler who wrote (2202)7/18/2001 1:17:31 PM
From: joe sax  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2306
 
Keith,

I don't think there is much if any formation damage.Looking at this morning's action it appears that Peter's & Company is pretty much hitting every bid that comes up on both BEA and STF.

I think if the above was not the case BEA would be trading closer to 50 cents as opposed to 40 cents.But,then again that's just par for the course when it comes to playing BEA and STF.

REGARDS
JOE SAX