To: Bilow who wrote (75896 ) 7/18/2001 5:38:47 AM From: techreports Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625 What Samsung was doing then, and is doing now, is trying to get people to use RDRAM by suggesting that it's going to become popular. Ya, it's a pretty common practice. Companies from every industry like to report rosy predictions about industry forecasts to help sales. Airbus believes it's double-deker plane is the future and says by 2020 that a majority of planes will be double-dekers. Boeing, says otherwise to scare airlines from buying Airbus's product. TI pushes W-CDMA and probably tells carriers it will be the dominate standard. Why? Because w-cdma will require more powerful DSP chips than Qualcomm's CDMA1x. More powerful chips probably means more sales for TI. Nokia is doing the same by predicting WCDMA is the future, because they'll make more money if it does..Since you don't know who to believe, you really have no idea whether to believe me or to believe Samsung. You know for a fact that I don't give a fig about your investment, but do you really think Samsung cares either, LOL? I'm not basing my investment off what Samsung says. If you are telling me not to trust what Samsung says, then why should i believe what DDR supports say (Micron, ect..?)Hey, people only suspect that I'm paid to bash this company, but there is absolutely no denying that Samsung will make more money if RDRAM ramps than they will if it dies. So who's getting paid to tell lies (or shade the truth) here? I agree. I think Samsung will continue to spread lies to gain support for RDRAM. Microsoft did it. Airbus and Boeing do it. Nokia and Qualcomm are doign it right now. Micron is doing it, too.Sure, there are going to be products that use RDRAM. The problem for RDRAM is that in order to get cheap (and therefore become universally used), it has to be in large production (and therefore universally used). This is a chicken and egg problem Right..i understand basic economic theories.. Do you understand that Intel sells nearly 80% of the world's CPUs? I think (if they wanted) they could easily get RDRAM volume in mass production.Unlike the cost of switching from SDRAM to RDRAM, there is almost no cost to switch the lines from SDRAM to DDR. And DDR's already almost as cheap as SDRAM, this despite the fact that SDRAM has dived in price. Can't argue with that. DDR does have this advantage. However, SDRAM was totally different than EDO (i think) and it cost more, yet it is now the standard and EDO is gone. The key is, will RDRAM ever be as cheap or offer a better price/performance ratio than SDRAM or DDR?Some of those companies are kind of big. Ever hear of Cisco, IBM, or Agere (Lucent), for instance? Yes i've heard about them ;) No doubt Cisco is big, but how much memory do their products use (more important)? I'd think Intel has more power when it comes to setting the next standard consider the average PC sold next year will probably contain 128+ megs of ram. WinXP will require even more.. btw, that's great all those companies support DDR, but when i checked out Dell's, Gateway's, IBM's, Compaq's, and Hp's website only one of the major boxmakers sold computers with DDR and that was HP. I could be wrong, but i didn't see any computers offered by the other box makers with DDR. Please correct me if i'm wrong, but that doesn't look like much industry support to me.