SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (48181)7/18/2001 6:32:46 AM
From: peter_lucRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Andreas,

"I really hope that AMD optimized it for clock-speed not IPC. It needs to be introduced at >3.0GHz for AMD to stay competitive."

I remember that earlier this year AMD officials said that Hammer will be introduced at three times the clock speed of the original Athlon when it was introduced back in 1999. That would mean a 1.8 - 2.0 GHz Hammer introduction. That would definitely not be enough, no matter how powerful the Hammer might be.

I fear that AMD is loosing momentum right now. Let's hope that the Crush chipset will come soon and bring AMD back into the game. Let's also hope that the low performance i845 chipset will backfire and create something like a "Celeron-effect". OTOH: If i845 is only less than 10% slower than i850, as early benchmarks indicate, this might go almost unnoticed by the public. Then Intel can play the MHz game plain and simple.

Peter



To: andreas_wonisch who wrote (48181)7/18/2001 10:56:05 AM
From: heatsinker2Respond to of 275872
 
Andreas- Mhz vs IPC I think this explains the push to SOI. If this gives a 30% boost in frequency, AMD could could get to 1.3 x 1.4 Ghz = 1.8 Ghz with .18u technology. So apparently AMD has concluded the same thing as you, that they have to pull even with Intc at max frequency. Hence, the all-out push to SOI.