Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (728)	7/18/2001 11:58:54 AM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

1) Does it really matter? It might matter in the investigation. If the cops should be looking for some kind of Looking For Mr. Goodbar type psycho killer, then it would be relevant to the investigation if she regularly engaged in that type of conduct. 2) Does it mean she deserved to die? No, of course not. 3) Where does the his spokeswoman get off with that kind of BULLSH!T remark? I agree that it is coming from the wrong source in the wrong way. Why not tell the cops that, and everything else, in the middle of May? Instead of telling the media now....it's not only BS, it's remarkably stupid. If it happened. (I think it is still being denied that the remark was made). 4) Where does the press get off reporting that kind of bullsh!t? The very fact that it gets printed lends credence to the remark and they know it! The press are on this Earth to make lawyers look good. They are the only ones capable of doing that job. <g>

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (728)	7/18/2001 12:13:41 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

Agustus....thanks for your RANT! The entire thing is beyond bizarre....Wouldn't you think if Condit liked Ms. Levy enough as a friend, and even more than a friend, that he would have expressed dismay (at the very least) at her disappearance. Heck, most of us would be out with the police trying to find her. At the VERY least, Condit should long ago have warned his staff and spokespeople against the very thing that has appeared in print, and attributed to one of his staff...