Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Trader J's Inner Circle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ajtj99 who wrote (44957)	7/18/2001 1:42:41 PM
From: Nicole Bourgault	Respond to of 56535

Thanks, A thing of sure, one of two will be mistaken. Nicole :)

To: ajtj99 who wrote (44957)	7/18/2001 2:52:43 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 56535

17 minutes past 2:30 and looking weak,Greenspan comments were not what people wanted to hear,i suspect(tiny bit optimistic with major bits of caution--but still sees turning by end of 2001<he thinks,knock-on-wood,type of statement>:). max

To: ajtj99 who wrote (44957)	7/18/2001 3:36:29 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 56535

IBM--max commits a post theft:) <<To:galactic1 who wrote (11920) From: Tom Hua Wednesday, Jul 18, 2001 3:03 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11926 Steve, bloody day. IBM's report is the only hope to rescue this market. I think they will meet earnings through cost cutting, but the top line may be under pressure. More importantly is the forward statements. IBM has managed well so far in this downturn but can they be immune for much longer? Probably not, and if that's what they say tonight, we're looking at more sell-off. Regards, Tom >> end quote.