Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (162150)	7/18/2001 2:44:50 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Guess that depends on the meaning of "crook". I certainly consider obstruction of justice, especailly by a lawyer to constitute criminal activity and there is no doubt in my mind Nixon participated in the coverup of an illegal and ill-advised burglary. I doubt he was aware of the burglary when it was committed but the cover up alone is sufficient reason to impeach and remove him without regard to the underlying act, just as Clinton's attempted coverup was eqully good reason to impeach and remove him. Clinton and Nixon are both crooks in my book. The only difference is that Nixon had the dignity and grace to resign. JLA