Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (92542)	7/18/2001 3:16:27 PM
From: isopatch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

<roflmao> Outstanding. Then, he could shorten his handle to Day Bits. Iso

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (92542)	7/18/2001 9:13:53 PM
From: DataBits	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

SliderOnTheBlack: it's not that complicated!!! Always enjoy your posts and thank you for the complements! Trimmed 30% of the OVERWEIGHT position bought in the $18 to $18.50 range posted earlier: Message 16033735 Message 16081583 If NEM pushes over $20, then trimming was myopic. Works both directions. NEM can hit $25 pretty quick (but not quite yet). Threat of mining strikes, weakening U.S. dollar, missle tests, poor earnings, and increasing market fears touts the BUY SIDE, not simple trimming of an overweight position. Cryptologic! If NEM sells-off to $17.5 to $18 range, will overweight again. Just my bits

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (92542)	7/21/2001 11:02:40 AM
From: Eclectus	Respond to of 95453

Slider An article by Scott Burns "Extra! The very real energy crisis: Demand for power is soaring quickly, while expanding supply can take years. That means trouble. By Scott Burns What really startles me is that so few people realize how close we are to being out of energy capacity. We seem to have two camps -- those who think we can never run out because there will always be more and those who think it doesn't really matter because energy is Old Economy. In fact, we may run out of spare capacity." That's what Matthew Simmons, president of the Houston investment bank that bears his name, said in a recent telephone interview. He thinks it's a serious problem. If you read the speeches he's made over the last two years, as I have, you'll probably agree with him. In speech after speech he has outlined how every aspect of the global system for the production and distribution of energy has been hollowed out so that it now faces the almost insurmountable task of major expansion in every facet -- even as it struggles to replace declining reserves. "The world has never run out of food. But we've had famines. It's a problem of distribution," he explains, pointing out that "spare capacity" can literally mean life or death for people or economies. "The problem we are facing is that expanding (from current capacity) by just 1% or 2% globally can take years -- but demand can grow that much in a year. "In fact, we're at capacity all around. We're at capacity at the wellhead. We're at capacity in refineries. We're at capacity in power plants. And we're at capacity in power transmission lines." Could he give some examples? "If you look at the last 30 years you'll see that we've added about 10% to the power base of electric plants every five years. But in the '90s we didn't do that. We added 4% in the first five years and 2% in the second five years. We added half that amount in transmission lines. But those who worried about it were labeled Cassandras." How about oil capacity? "In the Middle East we've added one substantial field in 20 years. It is just about to reach peak capacity of 500,000 barrels a day. But that's only a small percentage of the 75 million barrels a day that are consumed. In the Middle East some data is now emerging that the major fields are in decline. "The non-OPEC oil supply grew by only 2 million barrels a day through the '90s. That probably happened because the (original) production base is only 60% of what it was. We've been running just to stay in place. In natural gas we've been producing flat-out, but only increased production by 1% or 2%. "We're on the decline curve," Simmons said, referring to the inevitable depletion of oil production from existing oil fields. Ironically, even if a valve could be turned in the Middle East, our energy problems would not be solved. We'd need new ships to transport it and new refineries to crack it. Similarly, while small turbine producers like Calpine may deliver dozens of small electric generators in the next two years, the increased demand for natural gas to run the turbines may exhaust gas supplies. Basically, there is no slack anywhere because we missed a full decade of investment in new capacity. What will it take to solve the problem? Simmons' answer was startling. "Something like the Marshall Plan," he said, referring to the investment the United States made in rebuilding Europe after World War II. Simmons was quick to explain that he wasn't being literal. What he envisions is an effort of that scope, one that involves the public sector as well as private industry because it will take a 30% expansion in capacity (over 10 years) to meet demand and restore a degree of spare capacity. Do less than that, he is certain, and we'll stay inside the problem." Eclectus Got God Got Gold