Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48269)	7/18/2001 3:35:40 PM
From: milo_morai	Respond to of 275872

I heard him say it myself on a CC. 3 times the performance of the 1 Ghz Classic is the closest word for word I could give you, but I burned it into my head, as I almost couldn't believe he said it.. That would be a 50% IPC increase. If Jerry delivers that is huge. This URL confirms 2Ghz Hammer or faster. I saw the same info on Sharky's about 2+Ghz release. legionhardware.com M.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48269)	7/18/2001 4:18:12 PM
From: pgerassi	Respond to of 275872

Dear Tench: Actually it was on a slide of a presentation. It showed a 1 GHz 0.25 micron Classic at 1x and Hammer at 3x performance. I did not save that page but, I remember seeing it. Pete

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (48269)	7/18/2001 4:37:28 PM
From: andreas_wonisch	Respond to of 275872

Tench, Re: I don't recall ever hearing Sanders comparing potential performance of Hammer to a 1 GHz Athlon. I guess this AMD slide will convince you otherwise: heise.de (it's an official AMD slide shown at the last shareholder's meeting, slightly changed with German texts for the c't readers) Andreas