SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (139686)7/19/2001 10:51:33 AM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, RE: Niles has an agenda, pretty sinister if you ask me, squabbling over about 1.5%.


He's got an agenda, sure, but I don't think it's quite as sinister as you imply. He just wants to appear like he's correct, so he's going to spin any news at all as if it is negative. If people perceive him to be correct, then his stature goes up.

Look at Osha with Intel yesterday. He had estimates for the rest of this year that were clearly above the Street. That way, he could cut his estimates after Intel reported earnings and claim that the guidance was worse than he expected. And given that he's got a 2002 estimate (at 74¢) that is still way above consensus, he'll probably play the game for a while longer. It's an old, lame trick, but based upon the same premise. If you can spin news to fit your premise, somehow it might increase your stature. Games like that are pretty transparent, though.



To: Tony Viola who wrote (139686)7/19/2001 11:05:39 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony =- Re: "I heard a quick report on CNBC that Niles was taking the report somewhat negative "

That was Maria Bartiromo - reporting from the floor of the NYSE.

She was sooooo busy..but she HAD TO CALL DAN NILES in California at 6:25 AM and get his negative spin --- as if she couldn't call anybody in NYC and get another viewpoint.