SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : PLAYFAIR MINING - PLY . V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (203)7/19/2001 11:33:10 AM
From: geoffb_si  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 505
 
This is Ralph Cramden's idea of a moon shot not mine.

One of these days, Eliz, one of these days...TO THE MOON!

(gggggg)

Geoff



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (203)7/19/2001 11:48:15 AM
From: jpthoma1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 505
 
Agree with you, Elizabeth. The possibility of a miss on the first hole is real, if they can't find a geophysical method capable of confirming with a better precision the source of this large geochem anomaly.

But, I don't think they will issue a PR about the results of this first hole, if nothing is found. They will just take the drill a few hundred metres away and drill a second hole as fast as possible and so on. And as long as insiders, drillers and everybody else stay silent, this should not affect the stock price.

But, I agree, it's very difficult to prevent insiders trading, especially in juniors stocks.

JP



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (203)7/19/2001 11:55:17 AM
From: Brumell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 505
 
>>> During these early stage programs, I have found that I usually get a second and third chance to own the stock whilst the downside risk is being mitigated. <<<

Precisely! That's why it's attractive now as it corrects.

Bob



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (203)7/19/2001 12:45:31 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Respond to of 505
 
<I'm waiting for a drill program and a hole with mineralization in it. >

Certainly a position that make sense... cause if the results are not good...we go to sub $0.10