Dave, Please help me here, but if you wish not to engage
in my rough and turbulent ways of exchanges with others,
then i will cease asking for opinions on Tyhee on the
Gold and Silver Mining Stocks thread. doug
SI: StockTalk:
Gold, Mining, and Natural Resources:
Gold and Silver Mining Stocks
To: Ptaskmaster who started this subject
From: Doug A K
Friday, Jul 27, 2001
Facts & numbers from a penny in Canada's Northwest Territories.
If anyone is interested on a possible nothing to something,
then please review and post results. I will gladly accept
anyones opinion as my own based on a scale of 1 to 10
with the future telling the number to be. Thanks. doug
Tyhee Development Corp. TDC (Canadian Venture Exchange)
7/27/01 - Updates Gold Resource On 100% Owned Discovery Mine Property
stockhouse.com
To:Doug A K
From: Ram Rao
Saturday, Jul 28, 2001
<If anyone is interested on a possible nothing to something>
You must mean a certain something to nothing <g>
finance.yahoo.com
To:Ram Rao who wrote
From: Doug A K
Saturday, Jul 28, 2001
No problem for me Ram to counter your Trash Talk.
Will i trash you and others, absolutely no.
All i will do is present reality in the form of truTh.
Since the creation of this thread many companies
have been identified as most important to focus on,
while some have been tagged as having too many
questions unanswered or too many problems unsolved.
Since i joined this thread, using a gold_tutor's litmus test,
i have asked many times for an analysis of Tyhee using
the smallest possible amount of time and effort to be
inputted simply by reading their short news releases.
So far all i have gotten was no comment from most all here,
while at the same time other requests from the remaining
folks who post here get quick and detailed comments.
Also i have gotten "... will look into it later." With now later
being months later. Appearance is like that perception many
say can influence a buy/hold/sell just like real facts & figures.
Perception of Tyhee here is that it is only in my imagination
this company, as if i'm spamming a scam or a company only
worthly of trash talking(/w or /wo a -g- or smile face, what is
delivered to readers is still an impression of in-the-toilet)
or to be "ya, sure... i'll get back to you, and don't call me,
ya, i'll call you) or simply no reply from anyone with that
appearance like a perception of this company is worthless
today, tomorrow and in its next name change after a reverse
split like it just did a year or two ago after leaving Mongolia.
So fine, lets discuss gold companies using whats available
to monitor the price of gold, as in shareholder value depends
directly on the price of gold. Fine, and surprise surprise
the price of gold is influenced by more than the Bob Johnson's
data from his sheet's web site telling us that supply and demand
are now equal with a projection of the same in the near and far
futures years like 5. Seems this data supplied to us by Bob's
web site and himself directly from his posts also implies the
reality that the amount of demand being met today, yesterday
and tomorrow has come from mining and other ways that gold
is recycled, not from any other undisclosed manner that would
show his numbers to be very false.
Good Golly Gee, time for me to go to the GPM thread as there
seems to be an article available now that Hutch and ole49r
and Bob Johnson and Rarebird and Ron Reese can read
and deliver a knock-out punch to gata bill, showing how
the story of physical gold available to supply demand
out of a Central Bank or a nation's reserve of the people
has been in their thoughts, not happening. But if it was,
then the Bob's web site supply/demand facts are misleading.
Ya'up, once again i got un-focused with the person
i am repling to, as to get back on track, as follows.
You have said "I agree with you that it is not interesting
anymore to debate whether there are manipulations
going on. Gold will enter a Bull Market when investment
demand overwhelms whatever selling is out there."
Now you may be talking about the trading of company shares,
but you may need to include what i mentioned above about
the "... demand overwhelms whatever selling is out there."
in regards to physical gold itself being delivered in the form
of physical, not paper or derivates or any other form of toilet paper.
Imagine, all this from a simply request to have this thread
function its on-topic task and remark about Tyhee without
any ignore or trash or "its too worthless to discuss."
ak
To:Doug A K
From: Claude Cormier
Sunday, Jul 29, 2001
Doug,
I took a look at TDC and it seems that this micro-cap
has some good stuff to offer for only $800K of market cap.
It is small, but so is the market cap. Their balance sheet
is not in very good shape, and the stock will likely stay
idle for a while... but they have some interesting assets.
What I am worried about is for them to loose their option
on Discovery and Nicholas. WHat do you know about the later?
TDC is former Mongolia Gold... This was a stock that has
been touted by some analysts in the late 1990's.
Others claimed it had very low credibility.
In all, a controversial stock.
Do you know if there has been a chnage in management
since then ?
To:Claude Cormier
From: Doug A K
Sunday, Jul 29, 2001
Claude,
Thank you for your reply, and i will ask the president of Tyhee
to help me cover your comments so that i can report back to you.
I will respect your response to only watch this company
and not spend more time looking in to it until i or another
source identifies reasons to show that an initial investment
into Tyhee makes good trading sense. By this i mean that
at present your knowledge is represented by the awareness
of Tyhee through its past existance connected to Mongolia,
and until a substantial amount of new information becomes
available that presents the status of this company as being
"back in the game" in a well managed and financially sound
manner, along with those specific questions you asked about
areas in assets and options of which i am not able to answer
in any manner to qualify as one who knows about this stuff,
that until then and after all my poor English grammer, that
i respect your decision not to look at the recent company
update i posted until this company mets the minimum
requirements you need to allocate time and thoughts towards.
doug |
