Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Pump's daily trading recs, emphasis on short selling -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michail Shadkin who wrote (4419)	7/20/2001 6:32:39 PM
From: T L Comiskey	Respond to of 6873

Michail........ Bush to Decide on Stem Cell Funding Friday July 20 3:49 PM ET By ANJETTA McQUEEN, Associated Press Writer <<WASHINGTON (AP) - A leading Republican senator says he believes a majority of U.S. senators now support allowing federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter and 12 other Republican senators reiterated their support for the practice in a new letter to Bush on Friday. ``There is more than a groundswell here. There is really an avalanche of support,'' Specter said. Bush, an abortion opponent, has been grappling with a decision on whether to allow government support of stem cell research involving human embryos. Stem cells are master cells that can generate body tissue. Scientists believe the cures for many diseases could be unlocked from research using stem cells. Abortion opponents say harvesting the stem cells requires the death of an embryo, which many regard as human life. The issue is not pending in Congress at this time although several lawmakers have indicated they will bring up a bill if Bush rejects the funding policy, which had been instituted during the Clinton administration. Specter, who has written Bush on the issue previously, said Friday he believed there are 75 senators who would vote in favor of stem cell research should Congress take up the issue. That's more than enough to override a presidential veto. The letter sent Friday by Specter and other Republican senators said, ``Stem cell research has demonstrated a remarkable capacity of these cells to transform into any type of cell in the human body. If scientists are correct, stem cells could be used to treat and cure a multitude of maladies ... `` The letter also was signed by Sens. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Ben Nighthorse Campbell of Colorado, Ted Stevens of Alaska, Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, Gordon Smith of Oregon, Orrin Hatch of Utah, Richard Lugar of Indiana, John McCain of Arizona and John Warner of Virginia. The issue has created strange bedfellows. The United Methodist Church, known for supporting abortion rights, asked Bush, who is a Methodist, this week to uphold the ban. However, Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, an abortion opponent, called for the funding under strict guidelines. And on Thursday, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., sent Bush a letter signed by 59 Republican and Democratic senators supporting the practice. Earlier this week, Republican Sen. Bill Frist of Tennessee, the Senate's only physician and a key Bush ally, said he opposed abortion but felt compelled to support research that could save lives. His comments followed a federal health research report that said scientists should be free to pursue all avenues of research, including that involving human embryos. But it did not address the use of federal funds.>>

To: Michail Shadkin who wrote (4419)	7/20/2001 9:45:17 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6873

Max Pain. I did a post on Max Pain and Michail asked me to comment on it for the benefit of the thread. (I hope this commentary is a benefit). Apologies to those already using this tool. Max Pain is simply the point where the most options expire worthless (on a stock by stock basis). Here is the website: iqauto.com Best example I could ever give is today. INTC. We have seen stocks run on crap like their earnings and we have seen the opposite. I predicted a close at $30 +- a nickel. Well that call looks pretty good. If you look at the open interest in options on INTC I hope everyone gets a chance to see this before they are cleared this weekend... cboe.com That entire slate of options at 30 expired worthless. All the puts and all the calls. In addition all the calls above 30 are worthless as well. This is why you often hear 80% of options expire worthless. In this case, so many people betting on INTC BOTH ways (more on than against so we closed slightly below LOL) that they pinned it exactly at 30. I expected a small rally this afternoon just looking at INTC and a couple other things they needed to get a little higher, so the crooks could do their final adjustmenst as to where to close things. This one was so obvious I could PUKE. I did not follow Michail into NETA short because of max pain. It was 12. I do not like to bet against stocks in front of expiry that have a reasonable number of options open interest opposite of my play. It looked like a trap. All bets were against NETA. It really did not matter what NETA did, stock was probably not going to drop that far (except on a total disaster perhaps). That said..... PLEASE bear in mind Max Pain can and does fail miserably. One does not know at what point the powers to be hedged and if they are rooting (and hedged for the market to fall) then fall it will. Today in fact was one of the better performances as of late on Max Pain. Another problem with max pain is it looks at options as if they were all bought. If Calls were bought and PUTS were sold (The MMs have an enormous desire to drive things lower). I would GLADLY pay to see who was long and short. CBOE does not provide this. Just as short interest comes out only once a month, such info is too valuable to share. Also, if Joe Six Pack (retail investor) is heavy on one side and institutions the other, J6P will get crushed regardless of pain. In general it seems to work out as options are usually bought not sold. Some find it so unreliable that they do not use it at all. That said, it is my belief that it is far far better to have pain on your side than against close to expiry. It usually will prevent nonsense. Pretty big position in PMCS strike 30 calls. Hardly any strike 30 puts. PMCS gets clobbered on earnings but BRCM did not. Why.... cause BRCM max pain was about 40. PMCS all options in one direction. Please do not attempt to use Max Pain on thinly optioned issues. IT IS WORTHLESS. I have not figured out the amount of open interest it takes but someone pointed out how far something was below max pain (I believe it was NETE) and my reply was who cares. Never discount the fact that the news is known in advance and already hedged in the direction the news will go. Look at the false breakout and gap ups yesterday on BRCM, PMCS etc, when they know full well what they are going to do with them regardless of earnings. Everyone with a clue knew PMCS would have crappy earnings, Max pain suggested how the market would react. This is just another tool, and a handy way to look at things starting about 10 days in front of expiry when things start to trend towards pain. M