SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (80669)7/21/2001 9:25:12 PM
From: KymarFye  Respond to of 99985
 
My comments about waiting for the breakout were more oriented towards those inclined to jump the gun on the falling wedge, expecting a quick rewarding excursion to the rally high, which would be the conventional measuring implication for a breakout.

That could happen, but, as I suggested, and as BB just also suggested, a wedge such as this one could descend further (maybe a lot further) even in the normal course of development. In the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHART PATTERNS, Bulkowski provides an example of a falling wedge that breaks DOWN rather severely, and very near its apex, prior to breaking upward, and notes that roughly a quarter of the formations he observed in his research exhibited a similar tendency. In short, even if you "believe" in the formation, if you consider the possibility that the breakout may not occur prior to further elaborate downward-trending zig-zagging, committing now could by very disadvantageous for numerous reasons - time-wise as well as price-wise.

I agree with you that until and unless that breakout occurs, the predominant trend in the techs is obviously down. I trade intraday almost exclusively, but, presuming decent entries and no peculiar stock-specific problems, if I had longer term short positions or puts, I wouldn't feel compelled to cover prior to the breakout.